<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Licensing Requirements for SQL Profiles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/</link>
	<description>Just another Oracle blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 13:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: osborne</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-81214</link>
		<dc:creator>osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-81214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Frederic,

  The link is for 11.1 documentation. 11.2 does reference DBMS_SQLTUNE package which is what I have used to create a manual SQL Profile. 

http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/license.112/e10594.pdf

I&#039;ll go back and have a look at the behavior again and see what I come up with. 

Kerry]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frederic,</p>
<p>  The link is for 11.1 documentation. 11.2 does reference DBMS_SQLTUNE package which is what I have used to create a manual SQL Profile. </p>
<p><a href="http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/license.112/e10594.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/license.112/e10594.pdf</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll go back and have a look at the behavior again and see what I come up with. </p>
<p>Kerry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frederic eveilleau</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-81192</link>
		<dc:creator>frederic eveilleau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-81192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I red your intersting researches about tuning and licencing.
But, i observe somethings different.

First, on my 11.2.0.2, control_management_pack_access was set to DIAG+TUN.
I use one time the tuning advisor and implement PROFILE.
For licencing compliance, we reset control_management_pack_access to NONE (before the end of 2011)...
So, normaly, SQL Profile can&#039;t be used because it&#039;s a part of TUN.

But, when i check dba_usage i get :
select * from dba_feature_usage_statistics where currently_used = &#039;TRUE&#039; and name = &#039;SQL Profile&#039;

I obtain :
3432156699	SQL Profile	11.2.0.2.0	5	15	TRUE	06/12/2011 23:46:55	03/01/2012 23:33:45	2	(HUGECLOB)	03/01/2012 23:33:45	602864	604800	SQL profiles have been used.

So SQL Profile was used when management_pack is NONE...

Last things, the column Feature_info give :
Total so far: 2, Manual: 2, Auto: 0, Enabled: 2, Category count: 1

So maybe there is a difference of licencing if you use it Manualy or automaticaly ?

On the documentation for licencing :
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/license.111/b28287/options.htm#CIHDDBCG

there is no reference about SQL Profile....

So...

Great
Fred]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I red your intersting researches about tuning and licencing.<br />
But, i observe somethings different.</p>
<p>First, on my 11.2.0.2, control_management_pack_access was set to DIAG+TUN.<br />
I use one time the tuning advisor and implement PROFILE.<br />
For licencing compliance, we reset control_management_pack_access to NONE (before the end of 2011)&#8230;<br />
So, normaly, SQL Profile can&#8217;t be used because it&#8217;s a part of TUN.</p>
<p>But, when i check dba_usage i get :<br />
select * from dba_feature_usage_statistics where currently_used = &#8216;TRUE&#8217; and name = &#8216;SQL Profile&#8217;</p>
<p>I obtain :<br />
3432156699	SQL Profile	11.2.0.2.0	5	15	TRUE	06/12/2011 23:46:55	03/01/2012 23:33:45	2	(HUGECLOB)	03/01/2012 23:33:45	602864	604800	SQL profiles have been used.</p>
<p>So SQL Profile was used when management_pack is NONE&#8230;</p>
<p>Last things, the column Feature_info give :<br />
Total so far: 2, Manual: 2, Auto: 0, Enabled: 2, Category count: 1</p>
<p>So maybe there is a difference of licencing if you use it Manualy or automaticaly ?</p>
<p>On the documentation for licencing :<br />
<a href="http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/license.111/b28287/options.htm#CIHDDBCG" rel="nofollow">http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/license.111/b28287/options.htm#CIHDDBCG</a></p>
<p>there is no reference about SQL Profile&#8230;.</p>
<p>So&#8230;</p>
<p>Great<br />
Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyS</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-58139</link>
		<dc:creator>garyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-58139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I come from a part of the country (U.S.A.) where people use the term license as though it&#039;s plural. &quot;The officer asked for my license, so I handed them over.&quot; That&#039;s what I call a licentious use of the language.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I come from a part of the country (U.S.A.) where people use the term license as though it&#8217;s plural. &#8220;The officer asked for my license, so I handed them over.&#8221; That&#8217;s what I call a licentious use of the language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outline, SQL profile and SQL Plan Management(SPM) &#171; Oracle Explorer: Standing on the shoulders of giants</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-49150</link>
		<dc:creator>Outline, SQL profile and SQL Plan Management(SPM) &#171; Oracle Explorer: Standing on the shoulders of giants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-49150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] SQL profile It is useful with &#8220;force_matching&#8221; option for SQL with bad plan &amp; NOT using bind variables. If you want to know it, read this blog. Be careful, profiles created by SQL Tuning Advisor may change plans when stats change. Also SQL profile requires a license. http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2009/04/oracle-sql-profiles/ http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2009/07/why-isnt-oracle-using-my-outline-profile-baseline/ http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SQL profile It is useful with &#8220;force_matching&#8221; option for SQL with bad plan &amp; NOT using bind variables. If you want to know it, read this blog. Be careful, profiles created by SQL Tuning Advisor may change plans when stats change. Also SQL profile requires a license. <a href="http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2009/04/oracle-sql-profiles/" rel="nofollow">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2009/04/oracle-sql-profiles/</a> <a href="http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2009/07/why-isnt-oracle-using-my-outline-profile-baseline/" rel="nofollow">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2009/07/why-isnt-oracle-using-my-outline-profile-baseline/</a> <a href="http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/" rel="nofollow">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neeraj Bhatia</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-34068</link>
		<dc:creator>Neeraj Bhatia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-34068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kerry,

I really liked your response :-) Very funny.

Today I was not in mood to work and then (as usual) I started reading technical matter and your name strike to me. Now after reading this post, I am in good mood.

Thanks!

Neeraj]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kerry,</p>
<p>I really liked your response :-) Very funny.</p>
<p>Today I was not in mood to work and then (as usual) I started reading technical matter and your name strike to me. Now after reading this post, I am in good mood.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Neeraj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-33976</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 20:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-33976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve checked with the 11gR2 License guide, and here as well only
&lt;strong&gt;Automatic Plan Evolution of SQL Plan Management&lt;/strong&gt; is listed as part of the tuning pack, so &lt;strong&gt;Manual Plan Evolution&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Sql plan management&lt;/strong&gt; itself seem to be part of the EE without additional option.

Thank you for pointing to this interesting detail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve checked with the 11gR2 License guide, and here as well only<br />
<strong>Automatic Plan Evolution of SQL Plan Management</strong> is listed as part of the tuning pack, so <strong>Manual Plan Evolution</strong> and <strong>Sql plan management</strong> itself seem to be part of the EE without additional option.</p>
<p>Thank you for pointing to this interesting detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osborne</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-33921</link>
		<dc:creator>osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-33921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, you Brits are so picky about grammar. In Texas most people can&#039;t spell any version of licen(c/s)e, much less tell the difference between a noun and a verb (I&#039;m proudly including myself in that group by the way). I learned something new today though. You are absolutely correct in your comments about the word &quot;license&quot;, but apparently somewhere along the way, whoever was in charge of grammar in America decided that having a word that was pronounced the same but spelled two different ways depending on whether it was a noun or a verb was Bullocks. 

I was taught in grade school that there was only one word (license). I always figured licence was just a difference in spelling used by people speaking the Queens English (UK and Canada - maybe Australia and New Zealand). I never had any idea that you guys had two versions of the word to keep straight. After working on a project for a couple of months in London I had trouble with a couple of words that started wanting to have British spelling. I still struggle with that a little bit now and again and actually &quot;license&quot; is one of those words I struggle with. But I never had any idea you guys used both spellings. 

Here&#039;s a little excerpt from somewhere on the web citing &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;differences in the language&lt;/a&gt; (so it must be true):



&lt;blockquote&gt;-ce, -se

Nouns ending in -ce with -se verb forms: American English and British English both retain the noun/verb distinction in advice / advise and device / devise, but American English has abandoned the distinction with licence / license and practice / practise (where the two words in each pair are homophones) that British spelling retains. American English uses practice and license for both meanings.

American English has kept the Anglo-French spelling for defense and offense, which are usually defence and offence in British English; similarly there are the American pretense and British pretence; but derivatives such as defensive, offensive, and pretension are always thus spelled in both systems.

Australian[52] and Canadian usage generally follows British. &lt;/blockquote&gt;



I once heard someone say that England and America were two countries separated by a common language. How true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, you Brits are so picky about grammar. In Texas most people can&#8217;t spell any version of licen(c/s)e, much less tell the difference between a noun and a verb (I&#8217;m proudly including myself in that group by the way). I learned something new today though. You are absolutely correct in your comments about the word &#8220;license&#8221;, but apparently somewhere along the way, whoever was in charge of grammar in America decided that having a word that was pronounced the same but spelled two different ways depending on whether it was a noun or a verb was Bullocks. </p>
<p>I was taught in grade school that there was only one word (license). I always figured licence was just a difference in spelling used by people speaking the Queens English (UK and Canada &#8211; maybe Australia and New Zealand). I never had any idea that you guys had two versions of the word to keep straight. After working on a project for a couple of months in London I had trouble with a couple of words that started wanting to have British spelling. I still struggle with that a little bit now and again and actually &#8220;license&#8221; is one of those words I struggle with. But I never had any idea you guys used both spellings. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a little excerpt from somewhere on the web citing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences" rel="nofollow">differences in the language</a> (so it must be true):</p>
<blockquote><p>-ce, -se</p>
<p>Nouns ending in -ce with -se verb forms: American English and British English both retain the noun/verb distinction in advice / advise and device / devise, but American English has abandoned the distinction with licence / license and practice / practise (where the two words in each pair are homophones) that British spelling retains. American English uses practice and license for both meanings.</p>
<p>American English has kept the Anglo-French spelling for defense and offense, which are usually defence and offence in British English; similarly there are the American pretense and British pretence; but derivatives such as defensive, offensive, and pretension are always thus spelled in both systems.</p>
<p>Australian[52] and Canadian usage generally follows British. </p></blockquote>
<p>I once heard someone say that England and America were two countries separated by a common language. How true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Lewis</title>
		<link>http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/2011/01/licensing-requirements-for-sql-profiles/#comment-33909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 10:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kerryosborne.oracle-guy.com/?p=3099#comment-33909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kerry,

Nice follow-up.
A further &quot;corroborative&quot; thought - &quot;cardinality feedback&quot; happens automatically, and works by creating SQL Baselines; so, whatever the intent of the licence document, your system may end up using SQL Baselines even when you (as a DBA) had never done anything with them.

Nit-picking apology:
Licence is a noun
License is a verb

I have to admit that I sometimes forget which is which, but then analogy is helpful:
device is a noun
devise is a verb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kerry,</p>
<p>Nice follow-up.<br />
A further &#8220;corroborative&#8221; thought &#8211; &#8220;cardinality feedback&#8221; happens automatically, and works by creating SQL Baselines; so, whatever the intent of the licence document, your system may end up using SQL Baselines even when you (as a DBA) had never done anything with them.</p>
<p>Nit-picking apology:<br />
Licence is a noun<br />
License is a verb</p>
<p>I have to admit that I sometimes forget which is which, but then analogy is helpful:<br />
device is a noun<br />
devise is a verb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
